That includes its Regex gear, which uses C (rather than C++) in places and includes buffer overflows due to unsafe functions such as sprintf. Its not really suitable for production software.
#BOOST REGEX VS XPRESSIVE FULL#
9 years, 10 months ago Boost is full of bugs and appears to lack a coding standards and QA process. e.g.: #include 11 years, 4 months ago If you look at the highest-voted answer (from 2+ years ago), it mentions this. People should use Boost.Xpressive because it's newer and has a nicer license than "Microsoft Research end user license agreement" 12 years, 3 months ago In case anyone is looking at this old question for hints.a new library has shown up recently that deserves to be mentioned: Google's RE2: /p/re2 11 years, 6 months ago g++ 4.5.0. Eric Niebler then made in 2007 Boost.Xpressive. 13 years, 10 months ago As I wrote, if your std library doesn't have regex, then you can use boost: /doc/libs/1_36_0/doc/html/boost_tr1/… 12 years, 11 months ago GRETA ( /en-us/downloads/…) was made by Eric Niebler when he worked at Microsoft (1998-2001 from GRETA's header files). I know it doesn't help you on Linux, but others may be interested. For others curious to know more on TR1 and C++0x, see en./wiki/Technical_Report_1 13 years, 10 months ago As of SP1 Visual Studio 2008 has most of TR1, including regex. (Older (more documented) Spirit Qi libs found here)ġ 11 years, 7 months ago Related Topics regex linux c++ Comments 13 years, 10 months ago What compiler has TR1? My copy of g++ 4.1.2 (Debian Etch) does not have support for #include but thanks for bringing TR1 to my attention, I had forgotten. I'm currently enjoying boost spirit 3 - I like it more than regex, because it has BNF style rules and is well thought out. Lvm's libc++ regex works on ubuntu 14.04: libc++-dev - LLVM C++ Standard library (development files).
#BOOST REGEX VS XPRESSIVE CODE#
I used it a little to generate code to parse json. Or you can use ragel to generate a finite state machine to do the parsing for you, and generate the C/C++ code implementation: Most people still use the boost regex implementation. The GNU still doesn't implement regex yet.
If you can write it in c++11 - Do the tutorial: Īt the time of writing the only c++11 regex library that I know works is the clang/llvm one, and only works on Mac.
0 kommentar(er)
